ArticlePolymers2025
Simulation Analysis and Optimization Design of Dome Structure in Filament Wound Composite Shells.
Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Thermomechanical Responses of Cryogenic Composite Pressure Vessels with Different Dome Aspect Ratios.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Advances in Forming Processes of Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Thermoplastic Composites: From Material Challenges to Interface Engineering.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Carbon fiber-reinforced composites are widely used in the aerospace industry due to their exceptional mechanical properties. However, the dome region of composite pressure vessels is prone to stress concentrations under internal pressure, often resulting in premature failure and reduced burst strength. This study developed a finite element model of a reinforced dome structure, which showed excellent agreement with hydrostatic test results, with less than 5.9% deviation in strain measurements. To optimize key reinforcement parameters, a high-accuracy surrogate model based on a backpropagation neural network was integrated with a multi-objective genetic algorithm. The results indicate that compared to the unreinforced dome, the optimized structure reduced the maximum fiber-aligned stress in the dome region by 6.8%; moreover, it achieved a 9.3% reduction in overall mass compared to the unoptimized reinforced configuration. These findings contribute to the structural optimization of composite pressure vessel domes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.