Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Pavel ȚiuleanuLaboratory of SMART Polymeric Materials and Technologies, Mendeleev University of Chemical Technology of Russia, 125047 Moscow, Russia.
Artem A AtlaskinLaboratory of SMART Polymeric Materials and Technologies, Mendeleev University of Chemical Technology of Russia, 125047 Moscow, Russia.
Kirill A SmorodinLaboratory of SMART Polymeric Materials and Technologies, Mendeleev University of Chemical Technology of Russia, 125047 Moscow, Russia.
Sergey S KryuchkovLaboratory of SMART Polymeric Materials and Technologies, Mendeleev University of Chemical Technology of Russia, 125047 Moscow, Russia.
Maria E AtlaskinaLaboratory of SMART Polymeric Materials and Technologies, Mendeleev University of Chemical Technology of Russia, 125047 Moscow, Russia.
Anton N PetukhovChemical Engineering Laboratory, Lobachevsky State University of Nizhni Novgorod, 603022 Nizhny Novgorod, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-4904-7622
Andrey V VorotyntsevChemical Engineering Laboratory, Lobachevsky State University of Nizhni Novgorod, 603022 Nizhny Novgorod, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-5447-5296
Nikita S TsivkovskiyLaboratory of SMART Polymeric Materials and Technologies, Mendeleev University of Chemical Technology of Russia, 125047 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-8566-708X
Alexander A SysoevLaboratory of SMART Polymeric Materials and Technologies, Mendeleev University of Chemical Technology of Russia, 125047 Moscow, Russia.
Ilya V VorotyntsevLaboratory of SMART Polymeric Materials and Technologies, Mendeleev University of Chemical Technology of Russia, 125047 Moscow, Russia.
Funding
Ministry of Science and Education of the Russian Federation LABORATORY OF ELECTRONIC GRADE SUBSTANCES TECHNOLOGIES, PROJECT NO. FSSM2025-0004Russian Science Foudation 23-79-10288
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
This present study covers a complex approach to study a hybrid separation technique: membrane-assisted gas absorption for CO
Indexed as
carbon dioxideflue gasesgas separationhollow fibermembrane-assisted gas absorptionpolysulfone
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
The Production of High-Permeable and Macrovoid-Free Polysulfone Hollow Fiber Membranes and Their Utilization in CO · full record | OpenQuestion