ArticlePolymers2025
Design of a Dual Molecular Weight Polymer Gel for Water-Shutoff Treatment in a Reservoir with Active Aquifer.
Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study presents the formulation and evaluation of a dual molecular weight polymer gel system composed of partially hydrolyzed polyacrylamide (HPAM) and crosslinked with polyethyleneimine (PEI) for water shut-off applications. A soft gel, designed for deep reservoir penetration, was formulated using 5000 ppm high-molecular-weight HPAM, while a rigid gel for near-wellbore blockage combined 5000 ppm high- and 5000 ppm low-molecular-weight HPAM. The gel system was designed at 65 °C, with an initial gelation time exceeding 8 h and viscosity values below 15 cP before gelation, ensuring ease of injection. Laboratory assessments included bottle testing, rotational and oscillatory rheological measurements, and core flooding to determine residual resistance factors (RRFs). The soft gel achieved a final strength of Grade D (low mobility), while the rigid gel reached Grade G (moderate deformability, immobile), according to Sydansk's classification. RRF values reached 93 for the soft gel and 185 for the rigid gel, with both systems showing strong washout resistance and water shut-off efficiencies above 95%. These results demonstrate the potential of the HPAM/PEI gel system as an effective solution for conformance control in mature reservoirs with active aquifers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.