ArticlePolymers2025
Discharge Energy Versus Exposure Time in Atmospheric-Pressure Air Plasma Surface Treatment of Polyimide and Polyamide 6 Films.
Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Polyimide (PI) and polyamide 6 (PA6) films are treated under exposure times of 0.5 s and 1.0 s, and energy levels of 1.5, 2.0, and 2.3 mJ/pulse. PI exhibits the most substantial improvement in wettability and adhesion-related properties compared to PA6 and other studied polar polymers. The threshold level for stable surface modification is reduced, achieving a minimum water contact angle of 45°. The stability is markedly enhanced, with aged PI surfaces showing a 40% relative increase in adhesion work compared to untreated samples. The oxygen content on the PI surface reaches 22 at. %, surpassing the maximum of 18 at. % O observed for PA6. The surface roughness of PI increases by approximately a factor of 2, while PA6 shows an average increase of only 25%, attributed to higher ablation rates in the amorphous phase compared to the crystalline phase. The degree of surface modification achieved with [1.0 s; 1.5 mJ] treatment parameters is comparable to that with [0.5 s; 2.0 mJ], demonstrating that higher discharge energy can effectively shorten the required exposure time. This plasma treatment, even at very short exposure times, enables significant enhancement of the surface properties of PI, typically characterized by high chemical stability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.