ArticlePolymers2025
Mechanical Behavior and Durability Performance of Concrete Reinforced with Hybrid Date Palm and Polypropylene Polymer Fibers.
Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Response surface modeling and correlation analyses of mechanical and non-destructive properties in graphene-date palm fiber reinforced concrete.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Development of hybrid fiber-reinforced vinyl ester composites for civil and automotive applications.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Numerical Analysis on Mechanical Properties of Different Fiber-Reinforced Cold-Formed Steel-Concrete Composite Corner Columns.Polymers · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Concrete faces challenges related to brittleness and crack propagation, which compromise its tensile strength and durability. Fiber reinforcement has emerged as a promising solution, yet research on hybrid systems combining natural fibers, such as date palm fiber (DPF), with synthetic polymer fibers, like polypropylene fiber (PPF), remains limited. This study investigates the mechanical and durability performance of concrete reinforced with hybrid DPF and PPF, aiming to address the gap in understanding the synergistic effects of combining natural and synthetic fibers in cementitious materials, and improving the tensile strength and crack resistance of the concrete. Both the DPF and PPF were added at varying dosages (0%, 0.25%, 0.5%, 0.75%, and 1% by weight of cement). Both DPF and PPF reduced the workability, fresh density and compressive strength of concrete, with DPF exhibiting a more significant reduction due to its higher hydrophilicity and poor compatibility with the cement matrix. A maximum reduction of 44.78% was observed in the mix containing 1% DPF and 0.5% PPF. The fibers improved tensile strength and ductility, with mixes containing up to 1% combinations of DPF and PPF showing up to a 14.6% increase in splitting tensile strength and 9.5% improvement in flexural strength compared to the control mix. However, durability was compromised-water absorption increased by up to 58% in hybrid mixes containing 1.5% total fiber content, while pore volume rose by as much as 17.5% compared to plain concrete. These increases were more pronounced with higher DPF content due to its hydrophilic nature and poor cement compatibility. This study highlights the potential of hybrid fibers to improve concrete performance while promoting eco-friendly and cost-effective solutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.