ArticlePolymers2025
In Vitro Evaluation of the Mechanical Properties of Posterior Adhesive Restorations Fabricated Using Three Different Techniques.
Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07676929 (Clinical Evaluation of 3D-Printed Versus Semi-Direct Composite Resin Restorations), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Clinical Evaluation of 3D-Printed Versus Semi-Direct Composite Resin Restorations
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Three-Dimensional Printed Materials for Definitive Ceramic and Resin Restorations: A Scoping Review.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluates the optical properties and mechanical durability of adhesive restorations fabricated using different techniques for the treatment of single-tooth loss in the posterior region after an aging process. Sixty extracted human teeth (thirty molars and thirty premolars) were restored using three different fabrication methods: 3D-printed resin restorations, fiber mesh-reinforced direct composite restorations, and indirect composite restorations. Color stability was assessed using a spectrophotometer, and fracture resistance was measured using a universal testing machine. Finite element stress analysis (FEA) was conducted to validate mechanical test results under simulated intraoral conditions. The fiber-reinforced composite group exhibited the highest fracture resistance (1057.91 MPa), while 3D-printed restorations showed the lowest (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.