ReviewPolymers2025
Hybrid Materials Based on Self-Assembled Block Copolymers and Magnetic Nanoparticles-A Review.
Review in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advances and Applications of Block Copolymers II.Polymers · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
In this review work, the different routes and methods for preparing hybrid materials based on nanostructured block copolymers (BCPs) and magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) are analyzed, as they can be potentially employed in different sectors like biomedicine, electronic or optoelectronic devices, data storing devices, etc. The first procedure for their preparation consists of the nanostructuring of BCPs in the presence of previously synthesized NPs by modifying their surface for increasing compatibility with the matrix or employing magnetic fields for NP orientation, which can also promote the orientation of nanodomains. Surface modification with surfactants led to the selective confinement of NPs depending on the interaction (mainly hydrogen bonding) degree and their intensity. Surface modification with brushes can be performed by three methods, including grafting from, grafting to, or grafting through. Those methods are compared in terms of success for the positioning and confinement of NPs in the desired domains, showing the crucial importance of brush length and grafting density, as well as of NP amount and modification degree in the self-assembled morphology. Regarding the use of external magnetic fields, the importance of relative amounts of MNPs and BCPs employed and that of the magnetic field intensity for the orientation of the NPs and the nearby BCP domains is shown. The second procedure, consisting of the in situ synthesis of NPs inside the nanodomains by a reduction in the respective metallic ions or employing metal-containing BCPs for the generation of MNP patterns or arrays, is also shown. In all cases, the transference of magnetic properties to the nanocomposite was successful. Finally, a brief summary of some aspects about the use of BCPs for the synthesis, encapsulation, and release of MNPs is shown, as they present potential biomedical applications such as cancer treatment, among others.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.