ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Prevalence of Neuropathic Pain in Morocco: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prevalence of anxiety and depression in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to assess the prevalence of neuropathic pain in the Moroccan population through a systematic review and meta-analysis using a generalized linear mixed model (GLMM). The PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews and meta-analysis were followed. All observational prevalence studies, conducted in both the general population and hospital settings in Morocco, published before 1 December 2023, were included, provided that neuropathic pain was identified based on consensus criteria. The databases searched included PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the gray literature (Google Scholar). Data on the sample size, subgroups, sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of participants, as well as the methodology of each study, were extracted. The Joanna Briggs Institute tool for prevalence studies was used to assess the risk of bias. A random-effects generalized linear mixed model was applied for direct data adjustment, using Knapp-Hartung standard error correction. Heterogeneity was explored using Cochran's Q test, Higgins' I
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.