ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Simulators with Haptic Feedback in Neurosurgery: Are We Reaching the "Aviator" Type of Training? Narrative Review and Future Perspectives.
Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over the last decade, the quality of neurosurgical procedures dramatically improved, also thanks to the development and increased accessibility of several technological recourses (e.g., imaging, neuronavigation, neurophysiology, microscopy), allowing to plan increasingly complex approaches, while reducing the risk of postoperative complications. Among these resources, three-dimensional rendering and simulation systems, such as virtual and augmented reality, provide a high-quality visual reconstruction of brain structures and interaction with advanced anatomical models. Although the usefulness of these systems is now widely recognized, the additional availability of proprioceptive (haptic) feedback might help to further enhance the realism of surgical simulation. A systematic literature review on the application of haptic technology in simulation of cranial neurosurgical procedures was made. Inclusion criteria were the usage of simulators with haptic feedback for specific neurosurgical procedures whereas the studies that did not include an evaluation of the surgical simulation system by a surgeon were excluded. According to inclusion and exclusion criteria, 10 studies were selected. Simulation in neurosurgery still lacks a system capable of rehearsing the entire procedure-from skin incision to skin closure-while providing both visual and proprioceptive feedback. Consequently, further advancements in this area are necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.