Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40430079›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of molecular sciences2025

Efficacy of Using Dendritic Cells in the Treatment of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Helen F M Pacheco, Jhessyka L F Fernandes, Fernanda C R Dias, Marina C Deus, Daniele L Ribeiro, Márcia A Michelin, Marcos L M Gomes

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Helen F M PachecoDepartment of Structural Biology, Federal University of Triângulo Mineiro, Rua Vigário Carlos, 100, 10 Andar, Uberaba CEP 38025-350, MG, Brazil.
Jhessyka L F FernandesDepartment of Structural Biology, Federal University of Triângulo Mineiro, Rua Vigário Carlos, 100, 10 Andar, Uberaba CEP 38025-350, MG, Brazil.
Fernanda C R DiasDepartment of Structural Biology, Federal University of Triângulo Mineiro, Rua Vigário Carlos, 100, 10 Andar, Uberaba CEP 38025-350, MG, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6530-4684
Marina C DeusDepartment of Structural Biology, Federal University of Triângulo Mineiro, Rua Vigário Carlos, 100, 10 Andar, Uberaba CEP 38025-350, MG, Brazil.
Daniele L RibeiroDepartment of Cell Biology, Histology, and Embryology, Federal University of Uberlandia, Av Maranhão, 1783, Uberlândia CEP 38405-318, MG, Brazil.
Márcia A MichelinDepartment of Structural Biology, Federal University of Triângulo Mineiro, Rua Vigário Carlos, 100, 10 Andar, Uberaba CEP 38025-350, MG, Brazil.
Marcos L M GomesDepartment of Structural Biology, Federal University of Triângulo Mineiro, Rua Vigário Carlos, 100, 10 Andar, Uberaba CEP 38025-350, MG, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4397-4609

Funding

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais APQ-02736-18Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais BPD-00733-22
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) The primary prostate cancer treatment involves androgen deprivation therapy, with or without chemotherapy. Immunotherapy has emerged as a promising strategy against cancer due to its ability to modulate the immune system, overcome immune evasion, and stimulate the attack on tumor cells. Thus, this review urges an exploration of the underlying mechanisms to validate the efficacy and safety of dendritic cell immunotherapy for prostate cancer treatment. (2) An extensive literature search identified 45 eligible studies in PubMed, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and Embase databases. Phase I and II clinical trials and in vitro studies (PROSPERO registration number CRD42024538296) were analyzed to extract information on patient selection, vaccine preparation, treatment details, and disease progression. (3) Despite significant variability in vaccine development and treatment protocols, vaccines were shown to induce satisfactory immune responses, including T-cell activation, increased CD4 and CD8 cell populations, upregulated expression of HLA-A2 and HLA-DR, enhanced migratory capacity of dendritic cells, and elevated interferon levels. Cytokine responses, particularly involving Interleukin 10 (IL-10) and Interleukin 12 (IL-12), varied across studies. Immunotherapy demonstrated potential by eliciting positive immune responses, reducing PSA levels, and showing an acceptable safety profile. However, side effects such as erythema and fever were observed. (4) The analyzed treatments were well-tolerated, but variability in clinical responses and side effects underscores the need for further research to optimize the efficacy and safety of this therapeutic approach.

Indexed as

Cancer VaccinesDendritic CellsImmunotherapyProstatic NeoplasmsHumansMaleCancer Vaccinescancerimmune responseimmunotherapylymphocytesvaccine

Identifiers

PMID40430079
PMCPMC12112211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.