Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40429993›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025

Topical Molecular Iodine: An Optimal Biocide Constrained by Inadequate Formulations.

Jack Kessler, Sarah E Hooper

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jack KesslerI2Pure Incorporated, 44679 Endicott Drive, Ashburn, VA 20147, USA.
Sarah E HooperMicrobiology and Infection Research Group, Cardiff School of Health Sciences, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff CF5 2YB, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2452-3757

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The only biocidal iodine species in topical iodine disinfectants is molecular iodine (I2). I2, a biomolecule, has broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity and does not generate resistance. Physicians, regulatory agencies, and scientists have assumed that I2 is responsible for the skin staining and irritation associated with the clinical use of iodine disinfectants; this assumption is deeply embedded in the medical community but is not supported with empirical data. This study provides the first experimental data that measure the biocompatibility of I2 with human skin. Human skin explants in tissue culture were evaluated at 3, 7, and 24 h after being exposed to I2 (500 to 15,000 ppm). Cell viability was measured relative to phosphate-buffered saline using 3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2yl]-2,5-diphenyl-tetrazolium bromide (MTT). The biocidal activity of I2 vapor emitted from silicone was demonstrated against bacteria growing on agar to confirm I2 off-gassing from skin was an active biocide. Additionally, statistically significant bacterial reductions with both gas and solution phase I2 were observed in a static and dynamic five-species wound biofilm. The data suggest that high, e.g., 50-5000 ppm, levels of I2 should be incorporated into topical iodine disinfectants instead of the very low (0.2-10 ppm) levels found in 10% povidone iodine products currently in use.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective Agents, LocalDisinfectantsIodineAdministration, TopicalBacteriaBiofilmsCell SurvivalHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsSkinAnti-Infective Agents, LocalDisinfectantsIodinebiocompatibilitybiofilmhuman skinI2I2 vapormolecular iodine

Identifiers

PMID40429993
PMCPMC12111904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.