ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Impact of Genetic Testing Using Gene Panels, Exomes, and Genome Sequencing in Romanian Children with Epilepsy.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genomic Strategies in Pediatric Care: Addressing Rare Diseases in Children.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- From targeted SCN1A analysis to whole exome sequencing: clinical utility and novel genetic findings in a Hungarian paediatric epilepsy cohort.Human genetics · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Epilepsy is a prevalent neurological condition, having a wide range of phenotypic traits, which complicate the diagnosis process. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) techniques have improved the diagnostics for unexplained epilepsies. Our goal was to evaluate the utility and impact of genetic testing in the clinical management of pediatric epilepsies. In addition, we aimed to identify clinical factors that could predict a genetic diagnosis. This was a retrospective study of 140 pediatric patients with epilepsy with or without other neurological conditions that underwent NGS testing (multigene panel, WES = whole exome sequencing and/or WGS = whole genome sequencing). A comparison between genetically diagnosed versus non-diagnosed children was performed based on different clinical features. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify clinical predictors of a positive genetic diagnosis. Most children underwent gene panel testing, while 30 had exome sequencing and 3 had genome sequencing. The overall diagnostic yield of genetic testing was 28.6% (40/140) for more than 28 genes. The most frequently identified genes with causative variants were
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.