ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Uptake and Toxicity of Polystyrene NPs in Three Human Cell Lines.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gut and Glomerular Barriers Determine Nanoplastic Fate and Systemic Impact.ACS environmental Au · 2026Article
- Biological Responses to Combined Nanoparticles: Uptake, Distribution and Toxicity.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Intracellular Fate of a Dual-Fluorescent Hydrophobic Ion Pair: Comparison of Lipid-Based Nanocarriers.Molecular pharmaceutics · 2026Article
- Toxicity of High-Density Polyethylene Nanoparticles in Combination with Silver Nanoparticles to Caco-2 and HT29MTX Cells Growing in 2D or 3D Culture.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Polystyrene Nanoplastics in Human Gastrointestinal Models-Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms of Toxicity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Tracing micro and nanoplastics toxicity in human pulmonary fibroblasts through integrated Raman and transcriptomic analyses.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Internalization of nanoparticles (NPs), including nanoplastic, is one of the key factors determining their toxicity. In this work, we studied the toxicity and mechanisms of the uptake of model fluorescent polystyrene NPs (PS NPs) of three different sizes (30, 50, and 100 nm) in three human cancer cells lines; two originated from gut tissue (HT-29 and Caco-2) and one originated from liver tissue (Hep G2). Toxicity was measured by Neutral Red Assay (NRU), whereas mechanisms of uptake were studied using flow cytometry and different uptake inhibitors. The toxicity of the studied NPs followed a general rule observed for NPs-the smaller ones were more toxic than the larger ones. This relationship was dose dependent; however, the overall toxicity of the studied NPs was very low, despite the significant uptake of PS NPs. Although clathrin- and caveolin-dependent uptake is generally accepted as a major route of NP uptake, the inhibition of both mechanisms did not affect PS NP uptake in the cell lines studied in this work. Further experiments revealed that the major route of PS NP uptake in these cells is a scavenger receptor-mediated uptake.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.