ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
GSNCASCR: An R Package to Identify Differentially Co-Expressed Curated Gene Sets with Single-Cell RNA-Seq Data.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
(1) Differential co-expression analysis between two phenotypes with a known gene set helps to uncover gene regulation alterations. (2) GSNCASCR uses CSCORE to estimate the gene pair correlations for network reconstruction and GSNCA to quantify the structure changes of co-expression networks of the predefined gene sets. It also ranks genes based on their "importance" in the weighted network. The method is implemented with free R software (version 0.1.0, available on GitHub), allowing users to analyze their data with the help of demo vignettes included in the package. (3) With analysis of both simulated and real datasets, we demonstrate that the statistical tests performed with GSNCASCR are able to identify differentially co-expressed gene sets with higher precision than tests with Gene Set Co-Expression Analysis (GSCA, version 1.1.1) and Gene Sets Net Correlations Analysis (GSNCA, version 1.42.0). Specifically, GSNCASCR achieved an AUC value of 0.985, while GSNCA and GSCA achieved 0.817 and 0.893, respectively, when positive and negative pathways are defined as having more than 40% and less than 20% co-expressed gene pairs in the simulated data, respectively. Furthermore, across simulated data with varying noise levels, pathway sizes, and positive/negative pathway definitions, GSNCASCR consistently performs best in over 90% of scenarios, as evaluated by AUC values. With an available COVID-19 dataset, we show CD4
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.