ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Residue Monitoring and Risk Assessment of 51 Pesticides in Domestic Shellfish and Seaweed Using GC-MS/MS.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Monitoring and Risk Assessment of Pesticide Residues in Seafood Using LC-MS/MS.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Many monitoring studies have been performed to assess and manage the risk of residues in seafood contaminated with pesticides owing to various environmental factors. Although seaweed and shellfish have higher consumption rates than fish, studies on their pesticide residues are limited. Therefore, this study aimed to conduct residue monitoring and a risk assessment of 51 pesticides in shellfish (littleneck clam and oyster) and seaweed (sea mustard, seaweed fusiforme, laver, and sea tangle) cultivated in four administrative regions of the Republic of Korea. A total of 120 samples (20 samples per species) were collected, and pesticide residues were analyzed using a modified Quick, Easy, Cheap, Effective, Rugged, and Safe extraction method, followed by a GC-MS/MS analysis. The monitoring results show that oxadiazon was detected at 8-9 ng/g in only four littleneck clam samples. The estimated daily intake was calculated and compared with the acceptable daily intake (ADI) for risk assessment. The %ADI values ranged from 0.05% to 1.12% for average and extreme consumers across six different scenarios. The results of this study suggest that the detected residual levels of pesticides exert no harmful effects on people over a lifetime of consumption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.