ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
M-GNN: A Graph Neural Network Framework for Lung Cancer Detection Using Metabolomics and Heterogeneous Graph Modeling.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- CDR-Informed Graph Neural Network for Plasma Metabolomics in Lung Cancer and Pulmonary Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- A new era of precision diagnosis and treatment for lung cancer: artificial intelligence-driven multimodal data integration and clinical applications.Cell death & disease · 2026Review
- CRISPR and Artificial Intelligence in Neuroregeneration: Closed-Loop Strategies for Precision Medicine, Spinal Cord Repair, and Adaptive Neuro-Oncology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Graph-based analysis of histopathological images for lung cancer classification using GLCM features and enhanced graph.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, with early detection critical for improving survival rates, yet conventional methods like CT scans often yield high false-positive rates. This study introduces M-GNN, a graph neural network framework leveraging GraphSAGE, to enhance early lung cancer detection through metabolomics. We constructed a heterogeneous graph integrating metabolomics data from 800 plasma samples (586 cases, 214 controls) with demographic features and Human Metabolome Database annotations, employing GraphSAGE and GAT layers for inductive learning on 107 metabolites, pathways, and diseases. M-GNN achieved a test accuracy of 89% and an ROC-AUC of 0.92, with rapid convergence within 400 epochs and robust performance across ten random seeds; key predictors included age, height, choline, Valine, Betaine, and Fumaric Acid, reflecting smoking and metabolic dysregulation. This framework offers a scalable, interpretable tool for precision oncology, surpassing benchmarks by capturing complex biological interactions, though limitations like synthetic data biases and computational demands suggest future validation with real-world cohorts and optimization. M-GNN advances lung cancer screening, promising improved survival through early detection and personalized strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.