Incongruence Between Prerequisite Molecular Testing and Treatment with Personalized Therapies for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare Study.

Personalized medicine, including targeted and immunotherapy, has substantially changed the landscape of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). About 30% of NSCLC tumors have targetable mutations, like EGFR, and 28% of tumors will have a PD-L1 score or tumor mutation burden high enough to warrant immunotherapy; a molecular test prior to therapy assesses eligibility. However, the congruence between testing and treatment, and the effect of treatment without testing on outcomes, is understudied. We extracted a cohort of NSCLC patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare-linked data. The primary outcome was survival. Demographic and clinical characteristics of those receiving vs. not receiving a molecular test were compared, and a Kaplan-Meier curve along with a multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression assessed the association of survival with the receipt of molecular diagnostic testing, adjusting for sex, race, age, income tract, metro/urban/rural region, histology, and stage. There were 911 NSCLC patients treated with personalized therapy, of which 513 (56.3%) had received prior molecular testing. Black patients were less likely than White patients to receive testing (36.4% vs. 59.9%;