ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Facing the Challenge to Mimic Breast Cancer Heterogeneity: Established and Emerging Experimental Preclinical Models Integrated with Omics Technologies.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Three-dimensional spheroid models in breast cancer: tumor microenvironment complexity, cancer stem cell-driven resistance, and translational model integration.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Skeletal muscle as an endocrine and paracrine organ in breast cancer biology: a narrative review.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- Revolutionizing Breast Cancer Treatment: Harnessing Ehrlich Ascites Carcinoma Model, Cancer Metabolism, and Nanotechnology-Enhanced Chemotherapy for Improved Patient Outcomes.Cell biochemistry and biophysics · 2026Review
- Clusterin Promotes the Migration and Invasion of Highly Aggressive Breast Cancer Cells Through Molecular Mechanisms That Affect the Cell Cytoskeleton and Extracellular Matrix Dynamics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Inflammasome-associated pyroptosis and tumor angiogenesis in prostate cancer.Iranian journal of basic medical sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Breast cancer (BC) is among the most common neoplasms globally and is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in women. Despite significant advancements in prevention, early diagnosis, and treatment strategies made over the past two decades, breast cancer continues to pose a significant global health challenge. One of the major obstacles in the clinical management of breast cancer patients is the high intertumoral and intratumoral heterogeneity that influences disease progression and therapeutic outcomes. The inability of preclinical experimental models to replicate this diversity has hindered the comprehensive understanding of BC pathogenesis and the development of new therapeutic strategies. An ideal experimental model must recapitulate every aspect of human BC to maintain the highest predictive validity. Therefore, a thorough understanding of each model's inherent characteristics and limitations is essential to bridging the gap between basic research and translational medicine. In this context, omics technologies serve as powerful tools for establishing comparisons between experimental models and human tumors, which may help address BC heterogeneity and vulnerabilities. This review examines the BC models currently used in preclinical research, including cell lines, patient-derived organoids (PDOs), organ-on-chip technologies, carcinogen-induced mouse models, genetically engineered mouse models (GEMMs), and xenograft mouse models. We emphasize the advantages and disadvantages of each model and outline the most important applications of omics techniques to aid researchers in selecting the most relevant model to address their specific research questions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.