SynthesisInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Exosomal MicroRNAs as Epigenetic Biomarkers for Endometriosis: A Systematic Review and Bioinformatics Analysis.
Synthesis in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Translational Assessment of Omics Approaches in Endometriosis: Bridging Molecular Discovery with Clinical Utility.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- The uterine secretome initiates growth of gynecologic tissues in ectopic locations: re-evaluating the evidence.Pathology oncology research : POR · 2026Review
- Bioinformatics and machine learning-driven discovery of candidate tissue diagnostic markers for endometriosis with experimental verification.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Non-Invasive Extracellular Vesicle Biomarkers in Endometriosis, Molecular Signatures Linking Pelvic Inflammation, Oocyte Quality, and IVF OutcomesCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The clinical application of exosomal microRNAs as diagnostic biomarkers presents a promising approach for identifying potential markers of endometriosis. We conducted a systematic review of case-control studies to investigate exosomal microRNAs as epigenetic biomarkers potentially involved in the pathogenesis of endometriosis. A comprehensive literature search was performed across PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus databases, yielding 702 studies, with 12 meeting the inclusion criteria after screening and full-text review. These studies included 191 women with confirmed endometriosis and 169 healthy controls. Quality assessment using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale indicated a moderate quality across studies, with a common score of 5/9. In total, 668 exosomal microRNAs were found to be significantly differentially expressed between endometriosis patients and controls. In serum samples, 119 exosomal microRNAs were differentially expressed, with miR-22-3p, miR-320a, miR-320b, and miR-1273g-3p reported in more than one study. In endometrial tissue samples, miR-200c-3p and miR-425-5p were identified in more than one study, with miR-200c-3p consistently upregulated. Bioinformatic analysis indicated that these exosomal microRNAs are involved in key signaling pathways such as PI3K/Akt, MAPK, and TGF-β, which are associated with cell proliferation, migration, and inflammation. Despite these promising findings, variability in exosomal microRNA expression patterns across studies underscores the need for standardized methods and validation in large-scale, ethnically diverse cohorts. Future research should focus on rigorous validation studies to establish clinically relevant exosomal microRNAs for early diagnosis and improved patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.