Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40429647›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025

Shed Syndecans (1-3), ELA-32, BDNF, NLR, and hs-CRP in Parkinson's Disease: Appropriate Diagnostic and Prognostic Biomarkers When Combined in a Unique Panel.

Carmela Rita Balistreri, Daniele Magro, Letizia Scola, Paolo Aridon, Paolo Ragonese, Felipe Augusto Dos Santos Mendes, Giuseppe Schirò, Marco D'Amelio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Biomarkers in Heart Failure: A Review and a Wish.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Carmela Rita BalistreriCellular, Molecular and Clinical Pathological Laboratory, Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostics (Bi.N.D.), University of Palermo, 90134 Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5393-1007
Daniele MagroCellular, Molecular and Clinical Pathological Laboratory, Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostics (Bi.N.D.), University of Palermo, 90134 Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0009-0000-0000-1730
Letizia ScolaCellular, Molecular and Clinical Pathological Laboratory, Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostics (Bi.N.D.), University of Palermo, 90134 Palermo, Italy.
Paolo AridonDepartment of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostics, University of Palermo, 90129 Palermo, Italy.
Paolo RagoneseDepartment of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostics, University of Palermo, 90129 Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2516-1567
Felipe Augusto Dos Santos MendesGraduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Brasília, Brasília 72220-275, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2058-7481
Giuseppe SchiròDepartment of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostics, University of Palermo, 90129 Palermo, Italy.
Marco D'AmelioDepartment of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostics, University of Palermo, 90129 Palermo, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently, the management of Parkinson's disease (PD), the second most common neurodegenerative disease, is challenging due to the lack of consensus on blood biomarkers for diagnostic, prognostic, and outcome purposes. The identification of specific and sensitive biomarkers could contribute to an early diagnosis and, consequently, facilitate management and improve prognosis. Several molecules are emerging as potential biomarkers, although current data seem preliminary and need further validation. Further, their combination in a panel seems to strengthen their diagnostic power, allowing them to identify PD cases with greater specificity and sensitivity. In this study, we evaluated the association of a panel of molecules, including shed syndecans, ELA peptides, CD141, VEGF, BDNF, and systemic inflammatory indices, in 30 PD cases and 30 matched healthy controls. Significant differences in the systemic levels of all the molecules studied were detected in the PD group when compared to the healthy participants. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses, as well as correlations with clinical indicators, including PD severity expressed by the Hoehn and Yahr (H&Y) scale, highlighted the key role of the studied molecules as independent risk factors. Finally, the use of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves demonstrated the diagnostic value of hs-CRP, NLR, BDNF, shed syndecans (1-3), and ELA-32 in PD. Interestingly, their diagnostic performance significantly improved when combined in a panel. Overall, our results suggest that hs-CRP, NLR, BDNF, shed syndecans (1-3), and ELA-32 are significantly associated with PD and could likely serve as appropriate diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers, especially if combined in a panel.

Indexed as

Brain-Derived Neurotrophic FactorC-Reactive ProteinParkinson DiseaseAgedBiomarkersCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisROC CurveBDNF protein, humanBiomarkersBrain-Derived Neurotrophic FactorC-Reactive ProteinBDNFdiagnostic biomarkersELA peptidesglycocalyx shedding productsidiopathic Parkinson’s disease (PD)inflammatory molecules (i.e., hs-CRP) and their ratios (i.e., NLR)risk factors

Identifiers

PMID40429647
PMCPMC12110990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.