ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
PSMA PET as a Tool for Active Surveillance of Prostate Cancer-Where Are We at?
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The role of PSMA PET/CT in staging patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer.BJU international · 2026Pooled it
- Delayed Salvage Radiation Therapy Guided by Contrast-Enhanced Local and Whole-Body Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging During Prostate-Specific-Antigen-Based Surveillance After Radical Prostatectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Advances in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) as a biomarker in early and localized advanced prostate cancer: a narrative review.The Canadian journal of urology · 2026Review
- Precision Care for Hereditary Urologic Cancers: Genetic Testing, Counseling, Surveillance, and Therapeutic Implications.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Review
- PSMA-Targeted radiopharmaceuticals: from diagnosis to risk & quality of life.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Article
- Redefining Prostate Cancer Precision: Radiogenomics, Theragnostics, and AI-Driven Biomarkers.Cancers · 2025Review
- Predictive Value of Quantitative ADC, SUVmax, and the SUVmax/ADC Ratio for Biological Behavior and Prognosis in High-Risk Prostate Cancer.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Active surveillance remains the preferred treatment for men with low-risk prostate cancer and select men with favourable intermediate-risk prostate cancer. It involves the close observation of clinicopathological parameters to assess for disease progression, aiming to delay or avoid definitive treatment and related toxicities for as long as possible, without compromising oncological outcomes. A recent advancement in prostate cancer staging is the PSMA PET scan, which uses a tracer that strongly binds a highly expressed cellular biomarker for prostate cancer. Recent articles have also demonstrated that PSMA PET may be a useful tool for risk-stratifying prostate cancer, with the SUVMax of the scan correlated with higher-grade prostate cancer. This has ignited interest in the potential use of PSMA PET to identify men with higher-risk prostate cancer who may be unsuitable for active surveillance, particularly those who were incorrectly classified as lower risk upon initial diagnosis. This review article aims to assess the current state of the literature and clinical guidelines regarding the use of PSMA PET as a tool to risk-stratify prostate cancer, and whether it can be incorporated into active surveillance protocols to identify men who were incorrectly risk-stratified at time of initial diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.