ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Beyond the Limits of Conventional Coagulation Tests: A Comprehensive Overview of ACLF-Related Coagulopathies.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Risk factors for massive postoperative bleeding after orthotopic heart transplantation: a retrospective cohort study.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Article
- Beyond the Tipping Point: Advances in the Diagnosis and Management of Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure and End-Stage Liver Disease.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is a complex and severe condition marked by multiple organ failure and high short-term mortality. Coagulopathy, a key component of ACLF, is characterized by rebalanced hemostasis with both hypo- and hypercoagulable features, increasing the risk of bleeding and thrombosis. Conventional coagulation tests, including prothrombin time (PT) and platelet count, fail to fully capture the complexity of coagulation dysfunction in ACLF. Advanced diagnostic tools, like viscoelastic tests (VETs), offer a more comprehensive assessment, yet they remain limited in evaluating endothelial dysfunction and fail to account for reduced levels of anticoagulant factors. Emerging therapeutic strategies targeting coagulopathies in ACLF hold promise, but their clinical efficacy remains unclear. A more nuanced approach to diagnosing and managing coagulopathy in ACLF is needed, incorporating advanced hemostatic profiling to better inform prognosis and guide treatment decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.