Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40429488›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025

Position Paper on the Management of Sickle Cell Disease in Saudi Arabia: Understanding Disease Landscape, Identifying Challenges, and Exploring Opportunities in Transfusion Therapies.

Hind AlHumaidan, Abdullah Al Zayed, Ahmed Al Bahrani, Ammar Hasan Alsughayir, Kefah Baqir Algadeeb, Nour Al Mozain, Ohoud Kashari, Tahani Ali Mohamed Bin Ali, Hafiz Malhan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Hind AlHumaidanDepartment of Pathology, King Abdullah Bin Abdulaziz University Hospital, Princess Nora University, Riyadh 13412, Saudi Arabia.
Abdullah Al ZayedDepartment of Hematology, Qatif Central Hospital QCH, Qatif 32654, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-8629-7885
Ahmed Al BahraniDepartment of Blood Bank and Transfusion Medicine, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam 32253, Saudi Arabia.
Ammar Hasan AlsughayirDepartment of Blood Bank and Transfusion Services, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh 12231, Saudi Arabia.
Kefah Baqir AlgadeebDepartment of Hematology, King Fahad Hospital-Hofuf, Al Hofuf 36441, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-7081-1410
Nour Al MozainDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital, Riyadh 11564, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-0733-5466
Ohoud KashariDepartment of Pediatric Hematology, Jeddah Second Health Cluster, Jeddah 23816, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-0948-7380
Tahani Ali Mohamed Bin AliDepartment of Pediatrics Hematology Oncology, Prince Sultan Military Medical City, Riyadh 11159, Saudi Arabia.
Hafiz MalhanDepartment of Hematology, Prince Mohammed Bin Nasir Hospital, Jazan 82843, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-7148-9769

Funding

Terumo Blood and Cell Technologies Medical writing and publication of the manuscript was funded by Terumo Blood and Cell Technologies.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a common genetic disorder affecting up to 2.6% of the population in Saudi Arabia. SCD results in severe disability, reduced quality of life, extensive use of medical resources, increased economic burden, and a high likelihood of increased mortality. Red blood cell transfusion remains a cornerstone in the management of SCD complications. This position paper highlights the current state of SCD management within the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Despite the advantages of automated red blood cell exchange (aRBCX) and guideline recommendations, its use remains limited. In practice, aRBCX is used for a variety of indications, including acute management and prophylaxis of stroke, systemic fat embolism, severe forms of acute chest syndrome, preoperative management, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, hepatic crisis, and priapism. However, aRBCX is underutilized in pregnancy. Common gaps identified by the advisory panel include the absence of standardized national guidelines, limited access to aRBCX, issues with vascular access, lack of equipment, and insufficient staff training. Another limitation to the use of aRBCX is the higher blood requirements compared to other blood transfusion modalities. These factors contribute to geographical disparities in the management of SCD and suboptimal patient outcomes. To address these issues, the advisory panel recommended developing and implementing evidence-based national guidelines, expanding access to aRBCX, enhancing health staff education and training, and establishing a robust national SCD registry. By prioritizing these recommendations, we can help streamline SCD care, reduce practice variation, and nationalize sickle cell disease management in Saudi Arabia to improve patient care.

Indexed as

aRBCXclinical practiceexpert opinionposition paperred blood cell exchangeSaudi Arabiasickle cell diseasetransfusion therapy

Identifiers

PMID40429488
PMCPMC12111998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.