ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Lunar Regolith Improvement by Inducing Interparticle Adhesion with Capillary Forces.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper concerns the assessment of the lunar regolith ability to consolidate in the presence of liquid water and develop and sustain cohesion after drying. This type of cohesion originates from interparticle adhesion and can be potentially improved through grading modification. The research was conducted using the lunar regolith simulant (EAC-1A) reproducing the PSD of real lunar soil delivered from the Moon. LRS was subjected to water and elevated temperature (equal to the highest temperature on the Moon) to produce specimens of consolidated material, CCR (Capillary-Consolidated Regolith) and to test flexural strength. In order to adapt to potentially small stresses, tests were performed according to the modified EN 196-1 procedure intended for Portland cement testing: specimens scaled to 20 mm × 20 mm × 80 mm (new molds with Polytetrafluoroethylene/Teflon
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.