Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40429055›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Numerical Study of the Reinforcing Pads Geometry of Pressure Vessels.

Grzegorz Świt, Michał Szczecina

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Grzegorz ŚwitDepartment of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Kielce University of Technology, 25-314 Kielce, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-0392-5239
Michał SzczecinaDepartment of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Kielce University of Technology, 25-314 Kielce, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-3261-2813

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The structural design of pressure vessels is a rather complicated engineering task and demands on using finite element method (FEM) software to recreate many issues accompanying the design process. One of them is a choice of the shape of reinforcing pads, connecting a min shell of a vessel with nozzles. The mentioned issue is very rarely taken up by researchers. Some of them considered different reinforcement pads (circular and elliptical) using the finite element method (FEM), but they presented results of a nozzle-shell connection without describing results for the rest of the vessel. The other authors performed a thorough FEM analysis of a vessel, but they considered only circular reinforcing pads. The authors of this paper analyzed a pressure vessel without and with reinforcing plates with an elliptical shape. They performed FEM calculations of the vessels using a non-linear material model and a coupled thermal-stress analysis in Abaqus software. The use of the elliptic plate resulted in a considerable decrease in the thickness of the shell and turned out to be an interesting alternative to circular pads. In the presented example, the percentage decrease in thickness was equal to 36%, and the total mass savings was 30%.

Indexed as

finite element methodpressure vesselsreinforcing padssteel

Identifiers

PMID40429055
PMCPMC12113000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.