ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Clinician's Guide to Material Selection for All-Ceramics in Modern Digital Dentistry.
Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interfacial Microchemistry and Surface Stability of Monolithic and Layered Dental Restorative Systems: A Comparative SEM-EDS-XPS Study.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- Translucency of 3D-Printed 3Y- and 5Y-Doped Zirconia.Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.] · 2026Article
- The Influence of Material and Veneering Technique on the Marginal Fit of CAD/CAM Crowns.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- Article
- Evaluation of the degree of conversion of luting materials beneath hybrid ceramic CAD/CAM substrates of different thicknesses.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- The Effect of Thermal Cycling and Cyclic Loading on The Flexural Strength of Milled PMMA Versus 3D Printed PEEK as a Provisional Restorative Restoration.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dentistry · 2026Article
- Comparative Evaluation of Novel and Conventional Acid Etchants on the Surface Roughness of Lithium Disilicate and Zirconia Ceramics.International journal of dentistry · 2026Article
- Fracture resistance of CAD/CAM-milled, 3D-printed, and customized fiber post-and-core systems: an in vitro study.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- The Impact of Coffee, Matcha, Protein Drinks, and Water Storage on the Microhardness and Color Stability of a Nano-Ceramic Hybrid Composite CAD/CAM Blank.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
- Surface Assessment of a Novel Acid-Etching Solution on CAD/CAM Dental Ceramics.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
All-ceramic restorations are the foundation of modern restorative aesthetic dentistry. The industry for dental materials now provides a large selection of biomaterials with a range of constantly improving qualities. Although this is undoubtedly advantageous, the vast array of materials may confuse even experienced dentists. Even if recently the demand of digital dentistry in daily dental practice has significantly increased, due to a lack of understanding concerning cementation techniques, which are different for each type of ceramic used, dentists are continuing to be hesitant to utilise these various CAD/CAM materials. This study analysed 58 articles from 2008 to 2025, focusing on narrative, comprehensive, and systematic reviews and in vitro studies on dental dentistry materials. English articles were included, but non-English articles and case reports were excluded. The analysis included articles from all journal categories, ensuring adherence to inclusion and exclusion criteria. The aim of the research is to assess material classifications and properties that guide practices concerning the adhesive cementation of all-ceramic restorations. In order to provide a clear overview of the composition, characteristics, clinical considerations, and current trends of contemporary dental materials, as well as some recommendations for future research in this area that would be relevant to dentists and the scientific community, the authors of the paper were guided by this structure when writing the article content. The key is to ensure the aesthetics, resistance, and long-term clinical success of the treatment plan by providing dental professionals with clear, accurate information and instructions about resin-luting materials and indirect restoration materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.