Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40428971›Full record

ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Clinician's Guide to Material Selection for All-Ceramics in Modern Digital Dentistry.

Cristiana Cuzic, Mihai Rominu, Alisia Pricop, Horatiu Urechescu, Marius Octavian Pricop, Raul Rotar, Ovidiu Stefan Cuzic, Cosmin Sinescu, Anca Jivanescu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Translucency of 3D-Printed 3Y- and 5Y-Doped Zirconia.Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.] · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Cristiana CuzicDepartment of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Victor Babeș", 300041 Timișoara, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-2672-1677
Mihai RominuResearch Center in Dental Medicine Using Conventional and Alternative Technologies, School of Dental Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Victor Babeș", 300070 Timișoara, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-1199-3020
Alisia PricopResearch Center in Dental Medicine Using Conventional and Alternative Technologies, School of Dental Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Victor Babeș", 300070 Timișoara, Romania.
Horatiu UrechescuDepartment of Oral and Maxillo-Facial Surgery, Faculty of Dental Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Victor Babeș", 300041 Timișoara, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-9670-1079
Marius Octavian PricopResearch Center in Dental Medicine Using Conventional and Alternative Technologies, School of Dental Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Victor Babeș", 300070 Timișoara, Romania.
Raul RotarDepartment of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Victor Babeș", 300041 Timișoara, Romania.
Ovidiu Stefan CuzicDepartment of Hydrotechnical Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Politehnica University Timișoara, 300006 Timișoara, Romania.
Cosmin SinescuResearch Center in Dental Medicine Using Conventional and Alternative Technologies, School of Dental Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Victor Babeș", 300070 Timișoara, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-5651-7215
Anca JivanescuDepartment of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Victor Babeș", 300041 Timișoara, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-6835-5436

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

All-ceramic restorations are the foundation of modern restorative aesthetic dentistry. The industry for dental materials now provides a large selection of biomaterials with a range of constantly improving qualities. Although this is undoubtedly advantageous, the vast array of materials may confuse even experienced dentists. Even if recently the demand of digital dentistry in daily dental practice has significantly increased, due to a lack of understanding concerning cementation techniques, which are different for each type of ceramic used, dentists are continuing to be hesitant to utilise these various CAD/CAM materials. This study analysed 58 articles from 2008 to 2025, focusing on narrative, comprehensive, and systematic reviews and in vitro studies on dental dentistry materials. English articles were included, but non-English articles and case reports were excluded. The analysis included articles from all journal categories, ensuring adherence to inclusion and exclusion criteria. The aim of the research is to assess material classifications and properties that guide practices concerning the adhesive cementation of all-ceramic restorations. In order to provide a clear overview of the composition, characteristics, clinical considerations, and current trends of contemporary dental materials, as well as some recommendations for future research in this area that would be relevant to dentists and the scientific community, the authors of the paper were guided by this structure when writing the article content. The key is to ensure the aesthetics, resistance, and long-term clinical success of the treatment plan by providing dental professionals with clear, accurate information and instructions about resin-luting materials and indirect restoration materials.

Indexed as

adhesionall-ceramic restorationscomputer-aided designdental ceramicsmodern dentistryresin cements

Identifiers

PMID40428971
PMCPMC12113582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.