ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Mechanical Performance Evaluation of Negative-Poisson's-Ratio Honeycomb Helmets in Craniocerebral Injury Protection.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multi-Objective Optimization Design and Impact Protection Efficacy of Locally Reinforced P-TPMS Forehead Helmet Liner.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Helmets are crucial for protecting motorcycle riders from head injuries in accidents. This study proposes a helmet pad design based on a negative-Poisson's-ratio (NPR) structure and comprehensively evaluates its protective effect on head injuries. A concave hexagonal honeycomb structure was embedded into the energy-absorbing lining of a motorcycle helmet, and finite element collision simulations were conducted according to the ECE R22.05 standard. These simulations compared and analyzed the differences in protective performance between concave hexagonal honeycomb helmets with different parameter configurations and traditional expanded polystyrene (EPS) helmets under flat anvil impact scenarios. Using biomechanical parameters, including peak linear acceleration (PLA), head injury criterion (HIC), intracranial pressure (ICP), maximum principal strain (MPS), and the probability of AIS2+ traumatic brain injury, the protective effect of the helmets on traumatic brain injury was evaluated. The results showed that when the wall angle of the honeycomb structure was 60°, honeycomb helmets with wall thicknesses of 0.8 mm and 1.0 mm significantly reduced PLA and HIC values. In particular, the honeycomb helmet with a wall thickness of 1.0 mm reduced ICP by 25.7%, while the honeycomb helmet with a wall thickness of 1.2 mm exhibited the lowest maximum principal strain in the skull compared to EPS helmets and reduced the probability of AIS2+ brain injury by 7.2%. Concave hexagonal honeycomb helmets demonstrated an excellent protective performance in reducing the risk of traumatic brain injury. These findings provide important theoretical foundations and engineering references for the design and optimization of new protective helmets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.