Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40428923›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Influence of the Cortical Layer Thickness and Trabecular Layer Pattern Density on 3D-Printed Femur Strength.

Aleksander Znaczko, Krzysztof Żerdzicki, Paweł Kłosowski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Aleksander ZnaczkoDepartment of Structural Mechanics, Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Gdansk University of Technology, 80-233 Gdansk, Poland.ORCID 0009-0003-2616-1566
Krzysztof ŻerdzickiDepartment of Structural Mechanics, Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Gdansk University of Technology, 80-233 Gdansk, Poland.
Paweł KłosowskiDepartment of Structural Mechanics, Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Gdansk University of Technology, 80-233 Gdansk, Poland.

Funding

National Science Centre UMO-2022/47/D/ST8/02713
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper presents the process of preparing and conducting a uniaxial compression test, developing the results, and determining the compressive strength of a femur made using 3D printing technology. The study considers the variable thickness of the outer layer-imitating cortical bone tissue-and the varying density of the inner layer-imitating trabecular bone tissue-which, with further analysis, may aim to replicate different states of osteoporosis. The compressive strength of the bones varied depending on the thickness of the outer layer and the filling degree. Failure patterns were observed, corresponding to different variants of the produced bones. The predominant failure pattern was the fracture of the femoral head or neck at the proximal end of the femur. The results were compared with previous studies on commercial femur bones, as well as those created using 3D printing technology by other authors. The highest compressive strength was found in the bone with an outer layer thickness of 3.0 mm and 30% infill, with a value of 4778 N. A very similar compressive strength was recorded for the bone with an outer thickness of 2.1 mm and 30% infill, reaching 4519 N. The lowest compressive strength, 2116 N, was observed in the bone with an outer thickness of 1.2 mm and 20% infill.

Indexed as

3D printing3D printing patternscompositeexperimental researchfemurLPD methodvalidationYoung’s modulusZortrax M300 Plus

Identifiers

PMID40428923
PMCPMC12113265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.