ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Influence of the Milling Strategy on the Marginal Fit of Chairside-Fabricated Lithium Disilicate Crowns.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Influence of spacer and milling strategy on CAD/CAM ceramic crown fit and load-bearing capacity.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2026Review
- Fracture Resistance of CAD/CAM Lithium Disilicate and 3D-Printed Resin Crowns with Varying Occlusal Thickness: An In Vitro Study.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Utilizing dental CAD/CAM systems, chairside treatments allow patients to be treated within one day without the need for an intermediate dental laboratory. With this procedure, it is also essential to ensure a sufficient marginal fit of the restoration. Therefore, this study investigates the influence of the milling strategy on the marginal fit of CAD/CAM-fabricated lithium disilicate crowns. For this purpose, 10 crowns were fabricated from each of the materials IPS e.max CAD and Celtra Duo using the fastest and finest available milling strategy. The accuracy of the marginal fit of the 40 crowns was examined using the industrial scanner ATOS Triple Scan and the associated software using the triple scan protocol. In a comparison of the milling processes, the restorations fabricated using the finest process always exhibited a better marginal fit, with mean deviations of 87 μm and 146 μm for IPS e.max CAD and 111 μm and 118 μm for Celtra Duo. The difference was only statistically significant for the crowns made of IPS e.max CAD (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.