ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Development of a Process Technology to Improve the Internal Particle Density and Enhance the Performance of Medical Radiation Shielding Materials.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Protective garments for the medical radiation shielding of healthcare professionals must ensure flexibility and shielding performance. As such, process technologies for density enhancement are required when manufacturing shielding sheets to ensure the reproducibility of flexibility and shielding performance. Although previous efforts commonly reduced particle size to minimize porosity, nanoparticle production cost is significant. Therefore, this study aimed to improve the density of the shielding sheet by controlling the spacing between internal particles. The proposed improvement method is based on polydisperse particle packing. Particle sizes can be adjusted using process techniques such as sintering, pressing, and mixing. The study materials used are tungsten and bismuth oxide (eco-friendly alternatives to lead), with polyethylene as the polymer matrix. First, the shielding performance improved by 4% in the sintering process when the tungsten content reached 90 weight percent (wt%). The solvent removal process, used to eliminate the solvent added for polymer utilization, increased the density by 13.18%; however, it was lower than that of the compression process. The shielding performance improved by approximately 10% in the compression molding process when the tungsten content was 90 wt%. This study confirms that optimizing density enhancement strategies for radiation shielding materials can significantly improve shielding performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.