ReviewMicromachines2025
Advances in Electrode Design and Physiological Considerations for Retinal Implants.
Review in Micromachines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intraocular Micro-LED Epiretinal Projection for Anterior Segment Blindness: Design and Large-Animal Feasibility Study.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Bionic vision technologies: progress and perspectives on retinal prostheses and optogenetics for the treatment of advanced retinal degeneration.Frontiers in medical technology · 2026Review
- In Vivo Cone Photoreceptor Topography of the Human Foveola.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025Article
- Do retinal implants provide long-term efficacy, safety and improve quality of life? A systematic review.Therapeutic advances in ophthalmologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Until now, the ultimate solution for blind people has not been achieved, because challenges still exist. Retinal implants have emerged as a promising solution for restoring vision in individuals suffering from retinal degenerative diseases such as retinitis pigmentosa and age-related macular degeneration. Central to the efficacy of these implants is the design and functionality of the electrode arrays responsible for stimulating retinal neurons. This review evaluates the evolution of retinal implants, with particular emphasis on electrode specifications, physiological considerations for electrical stimulation, and recent advancements in electrode design. A comprehensive analysis of state-of-the-art published studies provides a detailed cross-comparison of electrode characteristics, offering insights into current state-of-the-art technologies and future directions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.