Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40428720›Full record

ArticleMicromachines2025

DBSCAN-PCA-INFORMER-Based Droplet Motion Time Prediction Model for Digital Microfluidic Systems.

Zhijie Luo, Bin Zhao, Wenjin Liu, Jianhua Zheng, Wenwen Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Micromachines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zhijie LuoCollege of Information Science and Technology, Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering, Guangzhou 510225, China.
Bin ZhaoCollege of Information Science and Technology, Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering, Guangzhou 510225, China.
Wenjin LiuCollege of Information Science and Technology, Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering, Guangzhou 510225, China.
Jianhua ZhengCollege of Information Science and Technology, Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering, Guangzhou 510225, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0224-0270
Wenwen ChenCollege of Information Science and Technology, Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering, Guangzhou 510225, China.

Funding

2022 Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering Graduate Education Innovation Plan Project KA220160228Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation 2023A1515011230Guangdong Enterprise Science and Technology Commissioner Project GDKTP2021004400Guangdong Natural Science Foundation General Project 2021A1515011605Guangdong Rural Science and Technology Commissioner Project KTP20240633Guangzhou Zengcheng Rural Science and Technology Commissioner Project 2021B42121631
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, emerging digital microfluidic technology has shown great application potential in fields such as biology and medicine due to its simple structure, sample-saving properties, ease of integration, and wide range of manipulation. Currently, due to potential faults in chips during production and usage, as well as high safety requirements in their application domains, thorough testing of chips is essential. This study records data using a machine vision-based digital microfluidic driving control system. As chip usage frequency rises, device degradation introduces seasonal and trend patterns in droplet motion time data, complicating predictive modeling. This paper first employs the density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise (DBSCAN) clustering algorithm to analyze the droplet motion time data in digital microfluidic systems. Subsequently, principal component analysis (PCA) is applied for dimensionality reduction on the clustered data. Using the INFORMER model, we predict changes in droplet motion time and conduct correlation analysis, comparing results with traditional long short-term memory (LSTM), frequency-enhanced decomposed transformer (FEDformer), inverted transformer (iTransformer), INFORMER, and DBSCAN-INFORMER prediction models. Experimental results show that the DBSCAN-PCA-INFORMER model substantially outperforms LSTM and other benchmark models in prediction accuracy. It achieves an R

Indexed as

DBSCAN-PCA-INFORMER modeldigital microfluidicsmicrodropletstime prediction

Identifiers

PMID40428720
PMCPMC12114172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.