ArticleMicromachines2025
Design and Analysis of a Passive Micromixer Based on Multiple Passages.
Article in Micromachines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We propose a novel passive micromixer based on multiple passages and analyze its mixing performance comprehensively. The multiple passages are constructed with straight channels, making them easier to manufacture, compared to conventional SAR micromixers and other micromixers based on curved channels. Its mixing performance has been demonstrated to be superior to that of the previous micromixers across a broad range of Reynolds numbers. Five distinct designs incorporating converging passages were explored to study the significance of the number of passages on the mixing performance. Across a broad range of Reynolds number ranges (0.1 to 80), the two-passage design significantly improved mixing performance, with a degree of mixing (DOM) consistently exceeding 0.84. Particularly, the mixing enhancement is prominent within the low and intermediate range of Reynolds numbers (Re≤20). This enhancement in the regime of molecular diffusion dominance stems from the elongated interface between the two fluids. The mixing enhancement in the transition regime is due to a secondary flow being generated on the cross-section normal to the main stream direction. The intensity of this secondary flow is significantly influenced by the number of multiple passages. The optimal number for the present micromixer design is two. The DOM remains almost constant for the submergence of multiple passages in the range of 40 to 70 (μm).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.