Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40428713›Full record

ReviewMicromachines2025

Mechanical Properties of Medical Microbubbles and Echogenic Liposomes-A Review.

Hussain Alsadiq, Zahra Alhay

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Micromachines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hussain AlsadiqDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Prince Mugrin, Medinah 42241, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-2826-4510
Zahra AlhayHealth Sciences Center, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lipid-shelled microbubbles (MBs) and echogenic liposomes (ELIPs) have been proposed as acoustofluidic theranostic agents after having been proven to be efficient in diagnostics as ultrasonic contrast agents. Their mechanical properties-such as shell stiffness, friction, and resonance frequency-are critical to their performance, stability, oscillatory dynamics, and response to sonication. A precise characterization of these properties is essential for optimizing their biomedical applications, however the current methods vary significantly in their sensitivity and accuracy. This review examines the experimental and theoretical methodologies used to quantify the mechanical properties of MBs and ELIPs, discusses how each approach estimates shell stiffness and friction, and outlines the strengths and limitations inherent to each technique. Additionally, the effects of parameters such as temperature and lipid composition on MB and ELIP mechanical behavior are examined. Four characterization methods are analyzed, including frequency-dependent attenuation, optical observation, atomic force microscopy (AFM), and laser scattering, their advantages and limitations are critically assessed. Additionally, the factors that influence the mechanical properties of the MBs and ELIPs, such as temperature and lipid composition, are examined. Frequency-dependent attenuation was shown to provide reliable shell elasticity estimates but is influenced by nonlinear oscillations, AFM confirms that microbubble stiffness is size-dependent with smaller bubbles exhibiting higher shell stiffness, and theoretical models such as modified Rayleigh-Plesset equations increasingly incorporate viscoelastic shell properties to improve prediction accuracy. However, many of these models still assume radial symmetry and neglect inter-bubble interactions, which can lead to inaccurate elasticity values when applied to dense suspensions. In such cases, using modified frameworks like the Sarkar model, which incorporates damping and surface tension explicitly, may provide more reliable estimates under nonlinear conditions. Additionally, lipid composition and temperature significantly affect shell mechanics, with higher temperatures generally reducing stiffness. On the other hand, inconsistencies in experimental protocols hinder direct comparison across studies, highlighting the need for standardized characterization methods and improved computational modeling.

Indexed as

acoustofluidicsechogenic liposomesmicrobubblesRayleigh–Plesset equationshell elasticityultrasonic contrast agents

Identifiers

PMID40428713
PMCPMC12114231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.