ArticleMicromachines2025
Precision Molding Simulation Study of 3D Ultra-Thin Glass Components for Smartwatches.
Article in Micromachines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Simulation and Experimental Study on Parameter Optimization for the Glass Molding Process of Automotive Panoramic Roofs.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
High stress and shape deviation during the glass forming process often led to low yield rates, posing a challenge in the production of high-precision smartwatch components. To address this issue, a numerical model was developed to simulate and analyze the forming behavior of 3D curved glass. The study focused on achieving a balance between energy consumption and key quality attributes, such as residual stress and shape accuracy. Results showed that forming pressure primarily affects shape deviation, while forming temperature plays a dominant role in energy usage and residual stress. Through orthogonal experiments, optimal parameters were identified: a forming temperature of 630 °C, pressure of 0.25 MPa, and cooling rate of 0.25 °C/s effectively minimize residual stress. Meanwhile, shape deviation is minimized at 630 °C, 0.30 MPa, and a cooling rate of 0.75 °C/s. Energy efficiency analysis indicated that low efficiency occurs at 610 °C with a 3 °C/s heating rate. Furthermore, NSGA-II multi-objective optimization validated the model's accuracy, with prediction errors under 20%, offering valuable guidance for the precise fabrication of smartwatch glass.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.