Modeling and Validation of Material Removal Based on Rheological Behavior Under Dynamic-Viscosity Nonlinear Coupling Effects.

Tianchen Zhao, Luguang Guo, Qilong Gao, Xu Wang, Binghai Lyu, Chen Li

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Micromachines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

1citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

Editorial for Special Issue on Ultra-Precision Machining of Difficult-to-Machine Materials.Micromachines · 2025
Article

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tianchen ZhaoCollege of Mechanical Engineering, Quzhou University, Quzhou 324000, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6214-7812

Luguang GuoCollege of Mechanical Engineering, Quzhou University, Quzhou 324000, China.

Qilong GaoCollege of Mechanical Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China.

Xu WangCollege of Mechanical Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1778-1064

Binghai LyuCollege of Mechanical Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1628-1084

Chen LiSchool of Mechatronics Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8259-0731

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 52305483National Natural Science Foundation of China 52375420National Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang province MS25E050079National Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang province QZQN25E050002National Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang province QZSZ25E050002Science and Technology Plan Project of Quzhou 2023 K207

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Compliant rheological polishing advanced in facilitating the generation of smooth curved surfaces. However, the inherent energy dissipation of the medium during flow results in an uncontrollable material removal distribution. This study proposes utilizing the motion of the tool to regulate the distribution of physical fields within the computational domain, thereby controlling material removal. A film thickness model is developed based on fluid dynamics and tribology principles to examine the pressure and velocity distributions within the film. In conjunction with contact mechanics and metallography, a material removal model is formulated and then validated and refined by valid experiment, demonstrating a positive correlation between material removal rate and surface quality. Optimization experiments produced a curved surface with an

Indexed as

fluid dynamicsmaterial removalnon-Newtonian fluidtribology principle

Identifiers

PMID40428698

DOI10.3390/mi16050572

PMCPMC12113941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.