ArticleMicromachines2025
Design and Fabrication of Silicon Pressure Sensors Based on Wet Etching Technology.
Article in Micromachines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A review of glass thermal reflow: method, device, and applications.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2026Review
- Etching characteristics and profile simulation of silicon.PloS one · 2026Article
- Transducer Systems Integrated into Organ-on-a-Chip Devices: From Detection to Fabrication.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper presents a novel silicon-based piezoresistive pressure sensor composed of a silicon layer with sensing elements and a glass cover for hermetic packaging. Unlike conventional designs, this study employs numerical simulation to analyze the influence of varying roughness levels of the sensitive membrane on the sensor's output response. Simulation results demonstrate that pressure sensors with smoother sensitive membranes exhibit superior performance in terms of sensitivity (5.07 mV/V/MPa), linearity (0.67% FS), hysteresis (0.88% FS), and repeatability (0.75% FS). Furthermore, an optimized process for controlling membrane roughness was achieved by adjusting the concentration of the etchant solution. Experimental results reveal that a membrane roughness of 35.37 nm was attained under conditions of 80 °C and 25 wt% TMAH. Additionally, the fabrication process of this piezoresistive pressure sensor was significantly simplified and cost-effective due to the adoption of a backside wet etching technique. The fabricated sensor demonstrates excellent performance metrics, including a sensitivity of 5.07 mV/V/MPa, a full-scale (FS) output of 101.42 mV, a hysteresis of 0.88% FS, a repeatability of 0.75% FS, and a nonlinearity of 0.67% FS. These results indicate that the proposed sensor is a promising tool for precise pressure measurement applications, offering both high performance and cost efficiency. This study not only advances the understanding of the impact of membrane roughness on sensor performance but also provides a practical and scalable fabrication approach for piezoresistive pressure sensors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.