Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40428556›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Consumer Sensory Perceptions of Natural Ingredients: A Multi-Country Comparison.

Jisoo Choi, Edgar Chambers, Jeehyun Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jisoo ChoiDepartment of Food Science and Nutrition, College of Human Ecology, Pusan National University, Busan 46241, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0009-0009-0586-3618
Edgar ChambersCenter for Sensory Analysis and Consumer Behavior, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66502, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2480-0200
Jeehyun LeeDepartment of Food Science and Nutrition, College of Human Ecology, Pusan National University, Busan 46241, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-2102-7531

Funding

Pusan National University BK21US Department of Agriculture Hatch 1016242
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Consumer perceptions of the term 'natural' do not always align with those of science or public policy. Further examination of the term from a consumer standpoint is therefore necessary. In this study, we aimed to identify differences in consumer perceptions of natural ingredients across various countries and demographic segments to determine whether a common concept of natural ingredients exists. Twenty ingredients were assessed to identify those perceived as natural by consumers. A total of 8191 consumers (about 630 consumers per country) were surveyed. Cluster analysis identified four clusters of countries with similar perceptions of natural ingredients. Most ingredients were evaluated similarly across countries; however, specific ingredients differed among certain countries. Several ingredients considered natural according to scientific, public policy, or marketing standards were not perceived as natural by consumers. These insights into perceptions of natural ingredients in each country may help governments, public policy experts, and food manufacturers reconsider strategies for marketing natural products and educating consumers about natural ingredients.

Indexed as

check-all-that-applyconsumercross-culturalingredientnaturalperception

Identifiers

PMID40428556
PMCPMC12110775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.