ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Enhancement of Microencapsulation of Rapeseed Oil Bioactive Compounds in Alginate Through Sonication.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Physical Processing of Aquatic Gel Foods: From Protein Structure Regulation to Health, Sustainability, and Personalized Design.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2026Review
- Protease-assisted microencapsulation of carvacrol in pea protein systems for enhanced and durable antibiofilm activity.Current research in food science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The microencapsulation of bioactive compounds from rapeseed oil using sodium alginate, in the presence and absence of an ultrasonic (US) field, is reported. A Box-Behnken experimental design is used to investigate the influence of process parameters on the microencapsulation yield; then, the response surface methodology is applied, to find their values ensuring its optimum yield. The operating parameters investigated are the ratio of sodium alginate to rapeseed oil, the microencapsulation time and the concentration of the calcium chloride solution. The US bath was used at its nominal power, and the microencapsulation temperature was kept at 20 °C, with a thermostat, for all experiments. A detailed study on the comparison of the two microencapsulation techniques (in the presence and absence of the US field) was carried out. Good results were obtained in the presence of the US field for optimal conditions, when the microencapsulation yield was 90.25 ± 0.02%, higher than the microencapsulation process performed in the absence of the US field, 87.11 ± 0.02%. The results also showed that the use of the US field (optimal conditions) led to an increase in encapsulation efficiency, total phenolic content and antioxidant capacity (76.56 ± 0.02%, 324.85 ± 0.01 mg GAE/g and 57.05 ± 0.12 mg/mL). The physicochemical description of microcapsules was performed using modern characterization methods. These results indicate that by increasing the microencapsulation yield of bioactive compounds through sonication, the process aims to achieve a uniform size distribution of microcapsules.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.