ArticleGenes2025
Genetic Diversity Among Wild and Cultured Bighead Carp (
Article in Genes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBighead carp (
methodsIn this study, eight polymorphic microsatellite markers were utilized to examine the genotypes and genetic diversity of 320 individuals of bighead carp populations located in the middle Yangtze River. This included four wild populations (ZX, DTH, SS, WH) and six cultured populations (HH, XZ, CH, QC, CD, HG).
resultsWild populations exhibited significantly higher genetic diversity (mean Na = 12.25 ± 0.63, Ho = 0.802 ± 0.063) than cultured groups (mean Na = 8.85 ± 1.21, He = 0.779 ± 0.032). Low differentiation (Fst < 0.05) among wild populations indicated high connectivity with low genetic structure, whereas cultured populations CH and HG showed moderate-to-high differentiation (Fst = 0.156-0.293). Bayesian analysis (K = 7) revealed a distinct clustering of wild populations, while cultured stocks exhibited admixed genetic ancestries. Bottleneck tests confirmed recent genetic bottlenecks in three cultured populations.
conclusionsWild bighead carp populations retain a critical genetic diversity, serving as reservoirs for conservation, while intensive aquaculture practices threaten genetic integrity through allele loss and inbreeding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.