ArticleGenes2025
Mitochondrial Genomes of the Robberflies
Article in Genes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAsilomorpha, an infraorder of predatory Diptera (Brachycera), is of significant evolutionary interest due to their remarkable ecological diversity, broad size range, and specialized feeding behaviors. However, phylogenetic studies of this group have been limited by sampling challenges.
methodsIn this study, we sequenced the complete mitochondrial genomes of two Chinese endemic species,
resultsBoth mitochondrial genomes exhibit the typical 37 genes (13 protein-coding genes, 22 tRNAs, and 2 rRNAs) and display pronounced AT bias. Congruent results from maximum likelihood analysis and Bayesian inference strongly supported the ideas that both new species are placed in Asilidae and that the Asilidae family is monophyletic. However, relationships among the three superfamilies remain unclear. Our results suggest that (1) although Asiloidea and Nemestrinidea are closely related, the potential positioning of Nemestrinoidea as an independent superfamily is worth investigating; and (2) Empidoidea may form a sister group to Asiloidea + Nemestrinidae, though this hypothesis requires further corroboration given the basal position of
conclusionsThese findings highlight the need for expanded taxon sampling, particularly of underrepresented families, to resolve deep-level relationships within Asilomorpha. Clarifying the phylogenetic relationships within Asilomorpha will facilitate future investigations into their evolutionary origins and the evolution of characteristic traits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.