Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40428315›Full record

ArticleGenes2025

Mitochondrial Genomes of Six Snakes (

Fei Zhu, Anqiong Lu, Ke Sun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fei ZhuSchool of Life Sciences, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang 550025, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1570-2967
Anqiong LuSchool of Life Sciences, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang 550025, China.
Ke SunSchool of Life Sciences, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang 550025, China.

Funding

Guizhou Normal University [2021]B03Guizhou Provincial Education Department [2024]51
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundColubridae, known to be one of the most species-rich snake families, remains relatively understudied in termshe context of complete mitochondrial genome research. This study provide the first systematic characterization of the mitochondrial genomes of six colubrid species:

methodIn this study, mitochondrial genomes were sequenced using Sanger sequencing. The raw data were subjected to quality- filtered withing using Fastp and subsequently assembled into complete mitochondrial genomes via SPAdes. Gene annotation was performed by Tblastn, Genewise (for CDS coding sequences), MiTFi (for transfer RNAs), and Rfam (for ribosomal RNAs). Sequence analyses were conducted with various tools, including MEGA, tRNAscan-SE, DnaSP, MISA, and REPuter. Finally, phylogenetic trees were reconstructed based on 13 protein-coding genes from 14 species.

resultsThe mitogenomes of these six species ranged from 17,143 to 17,298 bp in length and con-sisted of 13 protein-coding genes (PCGs), 22 transfer RNA genes (tRNAs), 2 ribosomal RNA genes (rRNAs), and 2 control regions. The nucleotide composition of the Colu-bridae mitogenomes was comparable with an A + T composition ranging from 52.1% to 58.8% except for the trnS1 and trnC. All the tRNAs could fold into a stable secondary structure. The Pi and Ka/Ks values suggested that atp8 was the fastest-evolving gene, while cox1 was the most conserved gene. Bayesian inference and maximum likelihood phylogenetic analyses yielded consistent results, with the six sequenced species clus-tering together with their congeneric species. These findings will provide valuable references for further research on the phylogeny of Colubridae.

Indexed as

ColubridaeGenome, MitochondrialPhylogenySnakesAnimalsMolecular Sequence AnnotationRNA, RibosomalRNA, TransferRNA, RibosomalRNA, Transfercomparative analysisLycodonmitochondrial genomephylogenetic relationships

Identifiers

PMID40428315
PMCPMC12110799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.