ArticleGenes2025
Dynamic Changes in Prokaryotic and Eukaryotic Communities and Networks in Minimally Managed Cabbage-Cultivated Field Soils.
Article in Genes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesTaxonomic profiling of soil microbial communities is useful for assessing and monitoring the biological status of agricultural land. In this study, we aimed to investigate changes in the taxonomic structure of soil organisms in minimally managed agricultural fields.
methodsWe used DNA metabarcoding to investigate both terrestrial prokaryotes and eukaryotes in cabbage-cultivated and uncultivated sites in a minimally managed agricultural field in central Japan from February to August 2021. Analyses of the relative abundances of prokaryotic and eukaryotic sequence variants (SVs) and their β-diversities, and the subsequent redundancy analysis (RDA) clarified the dynamic changes in eukaryotic communities during cultivation. We further investigated taxonomic changes in fungi-, protist-, and animal-derived SVs, abundant SVs in each eukaryotic phylum, as well as the co-occurrence networks of the top 150 SVs.
resultsThe results revealed that the fractions of predatory or parasitic protists and animals increased, whereas those of fungi and earthworm
conclusionsThese findings indicate the dynamic and sequential changes in soil communities in fields with minimal agricultural practices and could be useful for sustainable natural farming.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.