ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Transforming Bone Tunnel Evaluation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Introducing a Novel Deep Learning System and the TB-Seg Dataset.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence for Computer-Aided Detection in Biomedical Applications.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Bone Tunnel Microarchitecture and Early Functional Recovery After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Prospective HR-pQCT Cohort Study.The American journal of sports medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Evaluating bone tunnels is crucial for assessing functional recovery after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Conventional methods are imprecise, time-consuming, and labor-intensive. This study introduces a novel deep learning-based system for accurate bone tunnel segmentation and assessment. The system has two primary stages. Firstly, the ResNet50-Unet network is employed to capture the bone tunnel area in each slice. Subsequently, in the bone texture analysis, the open-source software 3D Slicer is leveraged to execute three-dimensional reconstruction based on the segmented outcomes from the previous stage. The ResNet50-Unet network was trained and validated using a newly developed dataset named tunnel bone segmentation (TB-Seg). The outcomes reveal commendable performance metrics, with mean intersection over union (mIoU), mean average precision (mAP), precision, and recall on the validation set reaching 76%, 85%, 88%, and 85%, respectively. To assess the robustness of our innovative bone texture system, we conducted tests on a cohort of 24 patients, successfully extracting bone volume/total volume, trabecular thickness, trabecular separation, trabecular number, and volumetric information. The system excels with substantial significance in facilitating the subsequent analysis of the intricate interplay between bone tunnel characteristics and the postoperative recovery trajectory after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Furthermore, in our five randomly selected cases, clinicians utilizing our system completed the entire analytical workflow in a mere 357-429 s, representing a substantial improvement compared to the conventional duration exceeding one hour.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.