ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Leveraging Function Intersectionality and Multi-Modal Cerebrovascular Reactivity Measures for the Derivation of Individualized Intracranial Pressure Thresholds in Acute Traumatic Neural Injury.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prognostic Value of Cerebrovascular Reactivity (PRx) Versus Intracranial Pressure (ICP) Monitoring in Traumatic Brain Injury: Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- A novel algorithm for the continuous determination of individualized intracranial pressure (iICP) thresholds using a multi-window weighted approach.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Optimal cerebrovascular reactivity thresholds for the determination of individualized intracranial pressure thresholds in traumatic brain injury: a CAHR-TBI cohort study.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
It has been proposed that subject-specific intracranial pressure (ICP) thresholds can be feasibly derived using the relationship between cerebrovascular reactivity and ICP. Such individualized intracranial pressure (iICP) thresholds have been suggested to have more robust associations with long-term outcomes of post-traumatic brain injury (TBI) than current guideline-based thresholds. However, both existing works have derived iICP using solely the pressure reactivity index (PRx) and a threshold of +0.20. Therefore, the goal of this study was to validate prior works and compare various cerebrovascular reactivity indices for their utility in deriving iICP. A custom iICP derivation algorithm was developed. Then, using existing archived human datasets from the Winnipeg Acute TBI Database, iICP thresholds were derived using three cerebrovascular reactivity indices: PRx, the pulse amplitude index (PAx), and the RAC (correlation (R) between the pulse amplitude of ICP (A) and cerebral perfusion pressure (C)). The yield of iICP derivation was found to vary significantly, depending on the cerebrovascular reactivity index and threshold used. A logistic regression analysis was then used to evaluate and compare the abilities of each index-derived iICP to predict the 6-month outcome. Among all index-threshold combinations tested, only PRx > 0 was able to produce an iICP that was able to outperform guideline-based ICP thresholds. PRx-based iICP seems to be superior to both PAx- and RAC-based iICP for predicting long-term outcomes. However, further work is needed to identify the ideal cerebrovascular reactivity thresholds for iICP derivation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.