ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
A Computational Study on Renal Artery Anatomy in Patients Treated with Fenestrated or Branched Endovascular Aneurysm Repair.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Magnetic resonance angiography-based assessment of the renal artery and its branching pattern.Anatomical science international · 2026Article
- Computational studies on visceral artery lesions and aortic pathologies involving visceral branches: a comprehensive review for the clinician.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Impact of stent graft geometry on hemodynamics in superior mesenteric artery reconstruction after fenestrated/branched endovascular aneurysm repair.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
(1) Background: Renal artery occlusion after F/B EVAR for abdominal aortic aneurysm is a serious complication that may require re-intervention, and understanding the hemodynamic mechanisms by which it occurs is essential to optimize the surgical procedure. (2) Methods: We used computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to analyze the impact of various parameters on blood flow. Theoretical vascular models were constructed based on the common dimensions and angles of aortic stents and branch arteries in clinical practice. Actual case models were constructed from CT image data of six patients treated with F/B-EVAR. Data were collected for analysis after simulation and calculation by FLUENT software. (3) Results: Theoretical model simulations showed that a larger tilt angle of the branch stent, smaller branch entry depth, and larger branch stent diameter were beneficial for blood flow. In the case models, a significant difference in the tilt angle of the renal artery stents was observed between the high- and low-flow groups, while the differences in entry depth and branch stent diameter were not significant. Occluded renal arteries had lower WSS values than patent ones. (4) Conclusions: This study offers valuable guidance for optimizing stent placement in F/B EVAR to mitigate renal artery occlusion risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.