Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40428099›Full record

ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Peptide-Drug Conjugates as Next-Generation Therapeutics: Exploring the Potential and Clinical Progress.

Krishna Jadhav, Ashwin Abhang, Eknath B Kole, Dipak Gadade, Apurva Dusane, Aditya Iyer, Ankur Sharma, Saroj Kumar Rout, Amol D Gholap, Jitendra Naik and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Self-Assembly of Peptides and Biomolecular Systems Into Functional Nanomaterials.Journal of peptide science : an official publication of the European Peptide Society · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Latest Advancements in Biotherapeutics.Current pharmaceutical biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Krishna JadhavInstitute of Nano Science and Technology (INST), Knowledge City, Sector-81, Sahibzada Ajit Singh Nagar, Mohali 140306, Punjab, India.ORCID 0000-0002-5875-2315
Ashwin AbhangDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Connecticut School of Pharmacy, Storrs, CT 06269, USA.ORCID 0009-0007-9713-6340
Eknath B KoleDepartment of Pharmaceutical Technology, University Institute of Chemical Technology, KBC North Maharashtra University, Jalgaon 425001, Maharashtra, India.ORCID 0000-0002-0782-581X
Dipak GadadeDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Delhi Skill and Entrepreneurship University, Dwarka Campus, Sector 9 Dwarka, New Delhi 110077, Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0003-3837-2486
Apurva DusaneDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Experimental Therapeutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.ORCID 0009-0005-2170-5442
Aditya IyerBiopharmaceutics Department, Biocon Bristol-Myers Squibb R&D Center (BBRC), Bangalore 560099, Karnataka, India.
Ankur SharmaHyalo Technologies, Somerset, NJ 08873, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1124-5658
Saroj Kumar RoutResearch and Development, LNK International Inc., New York, NY 11788, USA.
Amol D GholapDepartment of Pharmaceutics, St. John Institute of Pharmacy and Research, Palghar 401404, Maharashtra, India.ORCID 0000-0003-4145-4060
Jitendra NaikDepartment of Pharmaceutical Technology, University Institute of Chemical Technology, KBC North Maharashtra University, Jalgaon 425001, Maharashtra, India.ORCID 0000-0001-8906-7903
Rahul K VermaInstitute of Nano Science and Technology (INST), Knowledge City, Sector-81, Sahibzada Ajit Singh Nagar, Mohali 140306, Punjab, India.
Satish RojekarDepartment of Pharmacological Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3301-5941

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peptide-drug conjugates (PDCs) have emerged as a next-generation therapeutic platform, combining the target specificity of peptides with the pharmacological potency of small-molecule drugs. As an evolution beyond antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), PDCs offer distinct advantages, including enhanced cellular permeability, improved drug selectivity, and versatile design flexibility. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of the fundamental components of PDCs, including homing peptide selection, linker engineering, and payload optimization, alongside strategies to address their inherent challenges, such as stability, bioactivity, and clinical translation barriers. Therapeutic applications of PDCs span oncology, infectious diseases, metabolic disorders, and emerging areas like COVID-19, with several conjugates advancing in clinical trials and achieving regulatory milestones. Innovations, including bicyclic peptides, supramolecular architectures, and novel linker technologies, are explored as promising avenues to enhance PDC design. Additionally, this review examines the clinical trajectory of PDCs, emphasizing their therapeutic potential and highlighting ongoing trials that exemplify their efficacy. By addressing limitations and leveraging emerging advancements, PDCs hold immense promise as targeted therapeutics capable of addressing complex disease states and driving progress in precision medicine.

Indexed as

linkerspeptidepeptide–drug conjugatesstabilitytargeted therapeuticstheranostic

Identifiers

PMID40428099
PMCPMC12108627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.