ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Effects of a Wearable Assistive Device on Postural Control and Stability During Symmetric and Asymmetric Intermittent Trunk Flexion Tasks.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Center of Pressure Analysis of Postural Stability During Repetitive Reaching with Passive Arm-Support Exoskeletons.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Assistive devices, such as Exoskeletons (EXOs) can enhance endurance, but could inadvertently alter body mechanics, compromise balance, and elevate fall risk, particularly under fatigue. We evaluated effects of an EXO on postural stability during standing still and sustained trunk flexion tasks as users become fatigued during intermittently performed tasks. As trunk bending is common across many occupational/routine tasks, a repetitive 45° trunk flexion task was selected. In this controlled laboratory study, symmetric and asymmetric trunk flexion tasks were performed by twelve participants with a Back-support EXO until medium-high fatigue level (7/10 on Borg CR10 scale). Outcomes showed that the device increased trunk flexion durations (~16~25%), and upper-body movement beyond intended position. EXO-use improved stability by reducing maximum deviation (~22%) and mean velocity (~57%) of Center of Pressure (COP) co-ordinates. Asymmetric trunk flexion without assistance led to highest mean velocity of COP during fatigued state, but the same remained lower (~67%) with EXO-use, even with fatigue. The device decreased variance of COP during in medial/lateral direction (~44%), but increased the same in anterior/posterior direction by the same amount. Efforts in this study contribute towards understanding implications of using assistive devices for improving human performance across diverse applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.