ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
A Three-Stage Fusion Neural Network for Predicting the Risk of Root Fracture-A Pilot Study.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Predicting the risk of root fractures following root canal therapy requires diagnosis of the dental history and status of patients. However, dental history is a kind of categorical data type that is not easy to combine with numerical data to obtain good performance in deep learning. The accuracy of support vector machine (SVM) and artificial neural networks (ANNs) is 71.7% and 73.1%, respectively. In this study, a three-stage fusion neural network (TSFNN) is proposed to improve the multiple types of clinical data in the dental field based on ANNs. Clinical data were obtained from 145 teeth, comprising 97 fractured teeth and 48 nonfractured teeth. Each dataset contained 17 items, which were divided into 10 categorical items and 7 numerical items. TSFNN combines numerical and categorical NN with batch normalization and embedding layer techniques and can produce the accuracy of 82.1% and a 19.1% improvement in F1-score. It shows impressive performance in predicting the risk of root fracture. Furthermore, due to the limited amount of clinical data, it is believed that such a pilot study can effectively improve the results when the amount of clinical data is insufficient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.