Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40428056›Full record

ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Modeling Techniques and Boundary Conditions in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Analysis: Latest Developments in Simulation and Integration of Machine Learning and Data-Driven Approaches.

Burcu Ramazanli, Oyku Yagmur, Efe Cesur Sarioglu, Huseyin Enes Salman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Burcu RamazanliSchool of Information Technologies and Engineering, ADA University, Baku AZ1008, Azerbaijan.ORCID 0000-0002-8864-7225
Oyku YagmurDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, TOBB University of Economics and Technology, Ankara 06560, Türkiye.ORCID 0009-0009-9053-3372
Efe Cesur SariogluDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, TOBB University of Economics and Technology, Ankara 06560, Türkiye.
Huseyin Enes SalmanDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, TOBB University of Economics and Technology, Ankara 06560, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-7572-9902

Funding

ADA University noneScientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey 221M001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research on abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) primarily focuses on developing a clear understanding of the initiation, progression, and treatment of AAA through improved model accuracy. High-fidelity hemodynamic and biomechanical predictions are essential for clinicians to optimize preoperative planning and minimize therapeutic risks. Computational fluid dynamics (CFDs), finite element analysis (FEA), and fluid-structure interaction (FSI) are widely used to simulate AAA hemodynamics and biomechanics. However, the accuracy of these simulations depends on the utilization of realistic and sophisticated boundary conditions (BCs), which are essential for properly integrating the AAA with the rest of the cardiovascular system. Recent advances in machine learning (ML) techniques have introduced faster, data-driven surrogates for AAA modeling. These approaches can accelerate segmentation, predict hemodynamics and biomechanics, and assess disease progression. However, their reliability depends on high-quality training data derived from CFDs and FEA simulations, where BC modeling plays a crucial role. Accurate BCs can enhance ML predictions, increasing the clinical applicability. This paper reviews existing BC models, discussing their limitations and technical challenges. Additionally, recent advancements in ML and data-driven techniques are explored, discussing their current states, future directions, common algorithms, and limitations.

Indexed as

abdominal aortic aneurysmbiomechanicsboundary conditionsdata-driven techniquesdeep learningfluid–structure interactionhemodynamicsmachine learningWindkessel model

Identifiers

PMID40428056
PMCPMC12108684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.